This was a really high-powered session post half-term with our St Andrew's Debating & Interview Club with a General Election theme.
Our skill focus this week looked at Conclusions - how to end proposition and opposition arguments effectively as well as overall debates in an impressive manner.
Our newsround saw reference to the General Election, sporting contests from the T20 cricket world cup, to Man City, Man United football success as well as the F1 in Monaco. In addition we reflected on the remarkable life of Rob Burrow.
For our warm up we then turned to our interview style philosophical question with an emphasis on 'why'/justification?:
'Should the voting age be lowered?'
The group voted in favour of lowering, with a 65% majority.
There was a feeling that in some instances a vote at 16/17 would align with driving and other responsibilities and encourage participation. It was also felt that children should be allowed to have a say on their futures, particularly on the topic of Global warming/Climate change. However, many felt that 18 struck the right balance. Well done all for the reasoning behind the arguments given - it was quite clear that our St Andrew's debate club members should all have the vote!
Our main debate looked at the PMs plan to reintroduce national service if he formed the next Government.
The group rejected the idea overwhelmingly, although the second telling did see a small move in favour on the back of participating in voluntary services and choice.
Overall it was felt this was uncalled for by the military, unhelpful and unnecessary. Children/young adults should have a choice as to whether they participated and it might interrupt or prevent them from completing/working on other activities.
Well done on another tremendous session!
Commentaires